White Spot Lesions  

Sarah Abul Hasan
III Year BDS, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, India
Author    Correspondence author
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports, 2016, Vol. 6, No. 1   doi: 10.5376/ijccr.2016.06.0001
Received: 14 Oct., 2015    Accepted: 18 Nov., 2015    Published: 28 Dec., 2015
© 2016 BioPublisher Publishing Platform
This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Preferred citation for this article:

Sarah Abul Hasan, 2016, White Spot Lesions, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports, 6(1) 1-5 (doi: 10.5376/ijccr.2016.06.0001)

 

Abstract

White spot lesions are an early stage of tooth decay formation. White spot lesions are commonly associated with the fixed orthodontic treatment and it poses a significant problem in the clinical setup. These lesions are caused by tooth demineralization which results in visible enamel changes. Accumulation of plaque around the brackets and its improper removal is the main etiological factor behind the incidence of white spot lesions. The purpose of this study is to review the literature on the prevalence of white spot lesions and methods with which it can be prevented.

Keywords
Fixed Orthodontic appliances; Plaque accumulation; Fluoride application

Introduction
White spot lesions are defined as subsurface enamel porosity from carious demineralization that presents as a milky white opacity when they are located on smooth surfaces. Fixed orthodontic treatment alters the oral environment and increases the accumulation of plaque. Gingivitis and enamel decalcification around fixed appliances occur since cleaning becomes difficult with the presence of the orthodontic appliance and their components (Arends and Christofferson, 1986). Bands and brackets increase the retention of food and plaque on smooth tooth surfaces, which would otherwise tend have low prevalence of caries (Bishara and Ostby, 2008). The predictors for white spot lesions at debonding are visible plaque and streptococcus mutans. However, the removal of stagnant plaque alone does not achieve complete repair of white spot lesions and some spots that are secondary to debonding can last from 5 to 12 years (Willmot, 2008). Natural mineralization through saliva involving mineral gain in the surface layer of white spot lesions has little improvement on the aesthetics and structural properties of deeper lesions.

The fixed orthodontic treatment alters increases the amount of plaque and changes the composition of the oral flora since it becomes more difficult for the patient to clean the teeth. Despite many attempts at prophylaxis, the prevalence of white spot lesions remains as high as 61% after debonding (Pender, 1986). The facial surfaces of the lateral incisors and the canine are more severely affected, followed by the premolars and the central incisors. There was no difference in white spot lesion incidence in the right and left sides (Ogaard, 1989; Cochrane et al., 2010). The variation in WSL prevalence among studies could be due to the differences in number of teeth examined, the location of the study sample, the methods and standardizations of the examinations, treatment duration and materials used.

There is a higher risk of white spot lesion incidence in the preadolescent age than in the older patients due to differing brushing habits, treatment duration and phase-2 treatment (Chapman et al., 2008). In a study conducted, the use of a combination of antimicrobial and fluoride varnish significantly reduced formation of new lesions in the first 48 weeks of the treatment. However it did not result in less development of white spot lesions on the labial surfaces (Gorelick et al., 1982; Yeung et al., 1989).

Plaque accumulation around the brackets was generally higher in the first four months and gradually reduced during the course of the treatment because of the improved oral hygiene maintenance of the patient after they overcome the initial difficulties related to fixed appliance (Pender, 1986; Dalessandri et al., 2012). 

Visual assessment of WSLs by clinical or photographic examination can be used to quantify the severity of WSLs, but it is not sensitive to small changes (Gorelick et al., 1982).

Prevention
During orthodontic treatment, white spot lesions can be prevented by Fluoride application, calcium-phosphate based remineralising agents.

Fluoride varnish
Fluoride has been shown to arrest development and progression of carious lesions. Regular application of topical fluoride varnish during treatment may reduce the development of white spot lesions adjacent to the bracket base (Stecksen-Blicks et al., 2007). Although the remineralising capacity of fluoride on enamel is accepted, the evidence is not sufficient to support the effectiveness of fluoride in remineralising post orthodontic WSL (Heymann and Grauer, 2013). Fluoride varnishes can be used in the presence of plaque and thorough cleansing of the tooth surface is not required before application of the varnish (Ogaard et al., 2001).

Fluoride toothpaste
Toothpastes with high fluoride concentration (1 500~5 000 ppm) have been reported to show greater inhibition of demineralization though the conventional fluoride concentration of 1 000 ppm is efficient in reducing incidence of new caries (Heymann and Grauer, 2013). However, high concentration fluorides should be used in case of completely arrested lesions rather than active lesions as they lead to discolouration in the latter lesion (Ay et al., 2007; Ogaard et al., 2001).

Fluoride releasing bonding agents
Glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cements though mild, provide resistance to white spot lesions compared to other acrylic based cements. Glass ionomers show an initial burst of fluoride release but rapidly in decrease to levels that are unlikely to have any effect on caries prevention (Ogaard et al., 2001). 

Casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP)
Casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate works by increasing the levels of calcium and phosphate ions and thus enhances the incorporation of fluoride (Beerens et al., 2010). The use of indirect bonding technique for the placement of brackets revealed lesser accumulation of plaque and lesser presence of white spot lesions than direct bonding technique during the first four months of treatment (Dalessandri et al., 2012).

Xylitol
Xylitol is a polyol carbohydrate that cannot be metabolized by Streptococcus mutans. It has been known to reduce the risk of caries by preventing the attachment of Streptococcus mutans on tooth surfaces (Heymann and Grauer, 2013). Chewing xylitol gum increases the production of saliva that has high phosphate and calcium levels (Ay et al., 2007).

Diet
Refined carbohydrates and carbonated soft drinks have been well documented to play a major role in the development of caries. Sucrose has a negative effect on the development as the biofilms formed in the presence of sucrose have lower concentrations of calcium, phosphate and fluoride which are necessary for remineralisation.

Carbamide peroxide
The urea present in carbamide peroxide helps increase the pH of plaque and saliva. This increase in pH and the antimicrobial action of hydrogen peroxide helps to diminish plaque formation.

Post orthodontic Treatment
Vital bleaching-
Whitening of the teeth affected by the lesion lightens the healthy enamel as well as the affected enamel. However, the healthy enamel appears to increase in lightness more than the white spot lesion which gives less contrast between the unaffected enamel and the lesion.

Natural resolution by remineralisation-
After orthodontic treatment, visible white spot lesions diminish in area and improve in appearance after 1 to 2 years from debonding. Active lesions have a better prognosis compared to completely arrested lesions. The use of high concentration fluorides on active lesions arrest the lesions and result in discolouration of the lesions.

Resin infiltration-
The white opaque appearance of white spot lesions is due to the difference in the refractive index of the healthy enamel and demineralised enamel. The porous nature of an active white spot lesion allows low viscosity resins to permeate into the previously demineralised enamel matrix and fill in the voids with resin (Heymann and Grauer, 2013). This creates a refractive index that resembles that of healthy enamel and therefore there is an improvement in the appearance of the tooth. Resin infiltration is more successful in lesions that are not completely arrested.

Indirect porcelain restorations or direct resin restorations-
They can be given for cavitated lesions and for severe forms of white spot lesions that do not show significant improvement after conservative aesthetic treatment (Dalessandri et al., 2012).
 

 
 

Table 1 Preventive measures, intratreatment and postorthodontic treatment of white spot lesions


Conclusion
White spot lesions that are associated with orthodontic treatment can be minimized with proper prevention, management and treatment procedures.

References
Arends J., and Christofferson I., 1986, The nature of early caries lesions in enamel, J. Dent. Res., 65: 2-11
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345860650010201


Ay Z.Y., Sayin M.O., Ozat Y., Goster T., Atilla A.O., and Bozkurt F.Y., 2007, Appropriate oral hygiene motivation method for patients with fixed appliance. Angle Orthod., 77: 1085-1089
http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/101806-428.1


Beerens M.W., van der Veen M.H., van Beek H., and ten Cate J.M., 2010, Effects of casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate paste on white spot lesions and dental plaque after orthodontic treatment: a 3-month follow-up, Eur. J. Oral Sci., 118: 610-617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00780.x


Bishara S.E., and Ostby A.W., 2008, White spot lesions: formation, prevention and treatment. Semin Orthod., 14: 174-182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2008.03.002


Chapman J.A., Roberts W.E., Eckert G.J., Kula K.S., and Gonzalez-Cabezas C., 2008, Risk factors for incidence and severity of white spot lesions during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliance, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop., 138: 188-194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.10.019


Cochrane N.J., Cai F., Huq N.L., Burrow M.F., and Reynolds E.C., 2010, New approaches to enhanced remineralisation of tooth enamel, J. Dent. Res., 89: 1187-1197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022034510376046


Dalessandri D., Dalessandri M., Bonetti S., Visconti L., and Paganelli C., 2012, Effectiveness of an indirect bonding technique in reducing plaque accumulation around braces, Angle Orthod., 82: 313-318
http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/041811-273.1


Gorelick L., Geiger M., and Gwinnett A.J., 1982, Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding, Am. J. Orthod., 81: 93-98
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(82)90032-X


Heymann G.C., and Grauer D., 2013, A contemporary review of white spot lesions in Orthodontics, J. Esth. Res. Dent., 25: 85-95
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12013


Ogaard B., 1989, Prevalence of white spot lesions in 19-year olds: a study on untreated and orthodontically treated persons 5 years after treatment, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop., 96: 423-427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(89)90327-2


Ogaard B., Larsson E., Henrikkson T., Birkhed D., and Bishara S.E., 2001, Effects of combined application of antimicrobial and fluoride varnishes in orthodontic patients, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop., 120: 28-35
http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.114644


Pender N., 1986, Aspects of oral health in orthodontic patients, Br. J. Orthod., 13: 95-103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/bjo.13.2.95


Stecksen-Blicks C., Renfors G., Oscarson N.D., Bergstrand F., and Twetman S., 2007, Caries –preventive effectiveness of a fluoride varnish: a randomized controlled trial in adolescents with fixed orthodontic appliances, Caries Res., 41(6): 455-459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000107932


Willmot D., 2008, White spot lesions after orthodontic treatment, Semin. Orthod., 14: 200-208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2008.03.006


Yeung S.C., Howell S., and Fahey P., 1989, Oral hygiene program for orthodontic patients, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop., 96: 208-213 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(89)90457-5

International Journal of Clinical Case Reports
• Volume 6
View Options
. PDF(239KB)
. HTML
Associated material
. Readers' comments
Other articles by authors
. Sarah Abul Hasan
Related articles
. Fixed Orthodontic appliances
. Plaque accumulation
. Fluoride application
Tools
. Email to a friend
. Post a comment